• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

Call us Today!  (916) 290-7778

  • Email
  • LinkedIn

GAJP Logo New

Gale, Angelo, Johnson & Patrick P.C.

  • Practice Areas
    • Bankruptcy
    • Family Law
      • Child Support Law
      • Domestic Violence Law
      • Family Law Services
      • Child Custody Law
      • Divorce Law
    • Consumer Litigation
    • Estate Planning
  • Attorneys
    • Elliot Gale
    • Joe Angelo
    • Scott M. Johnson
    • Lauren Patrick
    • Natalya Kalinovskiy
    • Kevin A. Roux
  • Staff
    • Brittany L. Klein
    • Nicole Ceasar
    • Trishia Ures
    • Kaitlyn Monck
    • Jasmine Adams
    • Lisa Walker
  • Locations
    • Roseville Office
    • San Francisco Office
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Frequently Asked Questions

Mobile Menu

  • Practice Areas
    • Bankruptcy
    • Family Law
      • Child Support Law
      • Domestic Violence Law
      • Family Law Services
      • Child Custody Law
      • Divorce Law
    • Consumer Litigation
    • Estate Planning
  • Attorneys
    • Elliot Gale
    • Joe Angelo
    • Scott M. Johnson
    • Lauren Patrick
    • Natalya Kalinovskiy
    • Kevin A. Roux
  • Staff
    • Brittany L. Klein
    • Nicole Ceasar
    • Trishia Ures
    • Kaitlyn Monck
    • Jasmine Adams
    • Lisa Walker
  • Locations
    • Roseville Office
    • San Francisco Office
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Frequently Asked Questions

Schedule A Free Consultation Now!

(916)-290-7778

We’re Getting Divorced in California but Who Gets the Dog?

March 5, 2019 //  by Kevin Roux//  Leave a Comment

AB 2274, Quirk. Division of community property: pet animals.

“The signing of AB 2274 makes clear that court must view pet ownership differently than the ownership of a car, for example. By providing clearer direction, courts will award custody on what is best for the animal.” – California Assemblymember Bill Quirk

Last year on September 27, 2018, Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 2274 into legislation which entrusts our California court judges to address the proper care for our family animals during a marital dissolution or legal separation. The new bill that went into effect on January 1, 2019, amended the California Family Code differentiating our family animals farther from our average marital community assets such the kitchen pots and pans. California courts judges now have the authority to enter an order for “custody-like” arrangements between spouses and our treasured animals. 

Thomas and Rebecca lived in Sacramento, California when they adopted their cherished Labradoodle puppy named Tucker. After six years of marriage, they separate and eventually filed for divorce. During their divorce proceedings, Thomas and Rebecca move out of their marital home and into separate houses. One of their main concerns, besides splitting up all shared belongings was, who gets custody, Tucker?

Previously, the courts did not recognize the family animal as a “custody” issue whereas minors of the marriage have specific protections. Tucker was viewed as community property similar to the living room sofa or the Land Rover. The prior law during the dissolution of marriage or legal separation generally required the court to order a judgment upon the parties to make a property division that equally divides the community estate, except as otherwise specified.


Sixty-eight percent of U.S. households, or about 85 million families, own a pet, according to the 2017-2018 National Pet Owners Survey conducted by the American Pet Products Association (APPA). This is up from 56 percent of U.S. households in 1988, the first year the survey was conducted.

For example, if Thomas and Rebecca were finalizing their divorce in 2018, the court would recognize Tucker as a community property issue thus forcing assigned to one party or a stipulation to a shared agreement. If the parties create an understanding between themselves, the animal parenting plan would not be ordered by the court but rather between the parties only. In 2018, the following would have been a typical conversation.  Spouse 1: “you take the sofa, the Land Rover, and the everything in the kitchen, I’ll take Tucker.” Mostly, if there were opposition to the division, a court would be able to order the assignment based on equity. The family animal presented our family law judges with difficulties of granting one party sole ownership of a community property asset, such as our dear Tucker.  


On average, dog owners spent $225 on veterinary visits (vaccine, well visits) annually

2019 and going forward, the new bill authorizes the courts, upon request, to execute an order of sole or joint ownership of Tucker. The judge will take into consideration the care of the family animal and may order a party to care for the family animal before the final determination of ownership during the judgment of a marital dissolution or legal separation. Some factors the court will consider are the schedules of the owners and the ability to care for Tucker. Also, the court could assign a party to pay the fees associated with Tucker’s veterinary bills in need-based situations. AB 2274 provides our furbabies a welcomed protections when our parents are splitting up.  


Most owners (67 percent) own one dog

Section 2605 is added to the Family Code reads: 

2605 (a) The court, at the request of a party to proceedings for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the parties, may enter an order, prior to the final determination of ownership of a pet animal, to require a party to care for the pet animal. The existence of an order providing for the care of a pet animal during the course of proceedings for dissolution of marriage or for the legal separation of the parties shall not have any impact on the court’s final determination of ownership of the pet animal. 


(b) Notwithstanding any other law, including, but not limited to, Section 2550, the court, at the request of a party to proceedings for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the parties, may assign sole or joint ownership of a pet animal taking into consideration the care of the pet animal. 


(c) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: 

(1) “Care” includes, but is not limited to, the prevention of acts of harm or cruelty, as described in Section 597 of the Penal Code, and the provision of food, water, veterinary care, and safe and protected shelter. 


(2) “Pet animal” means any animal that is community property and kept as a household pet. 


While most households have family animals, California is only the third state to adopt protections for our pets. The courts’ procedures consider assigning the interests, well-being or care to our animals during a divorce or legal separation. The only other states to achieve this before California are Alaska in 2016 and Illinois in 2017. What are the other states doing for this important matter?

According to Arizona’s ABC 15, Arizona divorce rates have outpaced much of the nation which creates a challenge for which party keeps the family pet. Currently, Arizona law states that pets are treated as property. If the couple didn’t create a ‘puppy prenup’ before marriage, during the divorce proceeding the court will determine a solution based on several factors such as who initially adopted the pet, who paid for the majority of the care, and the best interest of the animal and the family as a whole. 


39-40% of U.S. households own at least one dog

Will California further help Alaska and Illinois push the agenda that family pets need special consideration during divorce and legal separations too? Currently, there are no California cases to reference the new change which keeps family law practitioners in the unknown. Many attorneys are concerned the courts will be bombarded with “pet-custody” issues of contentions which will create a strain on the already backlogged family court calendars. Are we supposed to rely on which furparent provides the “better” care for the animal? It seems like family lawyers are going to have their work cut out for them. 

So, if Rebecca wants to move out of state with Tucker while Thomas wants to stay in Rocklin with Tucker, they both better consult with their family law attorney to ensure Tucker isn’t left out in the dog house.

Do you have a story to share about your divorce and pet-custody? Send them to [email protected] , we’d love to hear about them. 


Citation

“AB-2274 Division of Community Property: Pet Animals.” California Legislative Information, 27 Sept. 2018, AB-2274 Division of community property: pet animals.

Fredricks, Fay. “Who Keeps the Pets after a Divorce under AZ Law?” KNXV, 10 Aug. 2018, www.abc15.com/news/state/who-keeps-the-pets-after-a-divorce-under-arizona-law.


Assembly Bill No. 2274

An act to add Section 2605 to the Family Code, relating to division of community property. 

Proposed by Assemblymember Bill Quirk representing the 20th Assembly District

Approved by Governor September 27, 2018.

Filed with Secretary of State September 27, 2018. 


Disclaimer: The information in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from GAJP Law P.C., or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction. Who gets the dog in the divorce?, What happens to my dog during my divorce?, Dogs during a divorce, dogs as community property, California divorce dogs, California pets divorce, California custody laws divorce pets, California custody dog divorce, can I apply for custody of my dog during my divorce, how to get full custody of my dog, can I get full custody of my dog?, Can I get custody of my pet, can I get custody of my cat?, How to file for legal custody of my dog, what documents do I need to file for custody of my dog, what documents do I need to file for custody of my cat, what documents do I need to file for custody of my pet, full custody of pet, divorce custody pets, doodles

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Category: Blog

Previous Post: « Your Credit Report…Is it updated?
Next Post: 3 Lessons to Learn from Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos’ Divorce »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Contact Us

Footer

GAJP P.C.

1430 Blue Oaks Blvd Suite 250
Roseville, CA 95747
Phone: (916)-290-7778
Fax: (916) 282-0771
Email: [email protected]

Gale, Angelo, Johnson & Pruett P.C. BBB Business Review

Practice Areas

  • Bankruptcy
  • Family Law
  • Consumer Litigation
  • Estate Planning

Attorneys

  • Elliot Gale
  • Joe Angelo
  • Scott M. Johnson
  • Lauren Patrick
  • Natalya Kalinovskiy
  • Kevin A. Roux

Contact Us

Site Footer

© GAJP P.C. All Rights Reserved.

“We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.”

Powered by imFORZA

 

Loading Comments...